Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 2 - 0 Fatic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.49% of points on their second serve, while Fatic has won 48.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 44.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 31.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 66.22% of matches played (W/L 49/ 25), with Fatic winning 50% (W/L 33/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.88% of matches (W/L 43/ 16), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Carabelli winning 2 times and Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 4 and Fatic winning 2. The last match between Carabelli and Fatic was at the Turin Challenger, 15-05-2023, First, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Fatic have played a deciding set 2 times, with Carabelli winning 2 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 0, and Fatic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.66 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 273.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 38.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
114
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
63% (316-185)
Career Total W/L
57% (343-258)
64% (27-15)
YTD W/L
40% (10-15)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$73,995
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Nerman Fatic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Carabelli VS Fatic
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 35 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:35 | 2:29:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (137/200) | 70% (131/188) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (97/137) | 68% (89/131) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (36/63) | 49% (28/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 24% (4/17) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (71/188) | 34% (67/200) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nerman Fatic
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 7-5 6-7(3) 6-3 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nerman Fatic
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (27/15) | 40% (10/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (56/39) | 44% (25/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (499/437) | 47% (257/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) | 33% (6/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:53 | 1:38:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.4 | 302.16 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1900/3024) | 65% (1041/1605) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1278/1900) | 68% (709/1041) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (545/1124) | 49% (275/564) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (151/324) | 39% (51/132) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1282/3050) | 36% (589/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (21/7) | 39% (7/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (25/40) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (19/4) | 8% (13/1) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carabelli are available here and Fatic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
